TTO

This forum is for posts that specifically focus on Ngene.

Moderators: Andrew Collins, Michiel Bliemer, johnr

TTO

Postby CMA » Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:47 pm

We are considering conducting a time trade-off (TTO) study using Ngene.
We would like to have a trade-off between perfect health and a specific health state, and would like to examine the impact of each attribute that made up the health state.
I would like to create "orthogonal" and "D-efficient designs" in Ngene, like URL research.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.008
How about a program like this?

"orthogonal"
Code: Select all
Design
;alts = alt1, none
;rows = 25
;orth = sim
;model:
U(alt1) = b1 * A[0,1,2,3,4] + b2 * B[0,1,2,3,4] + b3 * C[0,1,2,3,4] + b4 * D[0,1,2,3,4] + b5 * E[0,1,2,3,4] + b6 * F[0,1,2,3,4]
$

"D-efficient designs"
Code: Select all
Design
;alts = alt1, none
;rows = 25
;eff = (mnl,d)
;model:
U(alt1) = b1 * A[0,1,2,3,4] + b2 * B[0,1,2,3,4] + b3 * C[0,1,2,3,4] + b4 * D[0,1,2,3,4] + b5 * E[0,1,2,3,4] + b6 * F[0,1,2,3,4]
$

Tell me there was another good way.
Please give me your opinion.
CMA
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 3:42 pm

Re: TTO

Postby Michiel Bliemer » Fri Oct 14, 2022 9:51 pm

You seem to include an optout alternative, does this represent "perfect health" or "a specific health state"? They sound more like a status quo alternative with a specific level rather than an optout alternative.

For orthogonal designs you can use design coding 0,1,2,3, etc. However, for efficient designs you need to specify the utility function exactly as how you could estimate it in model estimation software, so perhaps you are using dummy coding such as b1.dummy[0|0|0|0] * A[1,2,3,4,0] where 0 is the base level. Also, you can consider non-zero priors to increase the efficiency of the data collection.

Michiel
Michiel Bliemer
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:13 pm

Re: TTO

Postby CMA » Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:18 am

I want to create "a specific health state".
For the orthogonal array, we want to use the design we created.
For efficient designs, I'm going to use dummy coding.
However, is it a problem that the D-error becomes larger than 1 when dummy coding is used?
My feeling is that it should be smaller than 0.1.
Code: Select all
Design
;alts = alt1, none
;rows = 50
;eff = (mnl,d)
;model:
U(alt1) = b1.dummy[0|0|0|0] * A[0,1,2,3,4] + b2.dummy[0|0|0|0] * B[0,1,2,3,4] + b3.dummy[0|0|0|0] * C[0,1,2,3,4] + b4.dummy[0|0|0|0] * D[0,1,2,3,4] + b5.dummy[0|0|0|0] * E[0,1,2,3,4] + b6.dummy[0|0|0|0] * F[0,1,2,3,4]
$
CMA
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 3:42 pm

Re: TTO

Postby Michiel Bliemer » Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:57 pm

You cannot compare D-errors across different models. If you are going to use dummy coding in model estimation, you need to use dummy coding for generating an efficient design. When I run the syntax it states a D-error of 0.52, which is fine. Note that D-errors are case specific and depend also on the unit you choose for your variables, so you should ignore the absolute value as it has no meaning.

Michiel
Michiel Bliemer
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:13 pm


Return to Choice experiments - Ngene

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron