Strange design output for what should be straightforward...

This forum is for posts that specifically focus on Ngene.

Moderators: Andrew Collins, Michiel Bliemer, johnr

Strange design output for what should be straightforward...

Postby Ben Beardmore » Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:55 am

Here is a straight forward orthogonal design in 32 rows. All 6 attributes are specified to have 4 levels. I've pasted the design below, and for some strange reason, attribute one only has 3 levels represented. What's going on?!

Design
;alts = alt1, alt2
;rows = 32
;orth = sim
;model:
U(alt1) =
b1 +
b2 * A[0,1,2,3] +
b3 * B[0,1,2,3] +
b4 * C[0,1,2,3] +
b5 * D[0,1,2,3] +
b6 * E[0,1,2,3] +
b7 * F[0,1,2,3]
$



Choice situation alt1.a alt1.b alt1.c alt1.d alt1.e alt1.f
1 2 2 0 3 1 0
2 2 0 0 0 0 2
3 1 1 0 1 0 0
4 1 3 0 1 2 1
5 2 0 0 3 3 1
6 2 2 0 0 2 3
7 0 3 0 2 1 2
8 0 1 0 2 3 3
9 1 2 2 2 0 3
10 0 2 2 1 3 0
11 2 1 2 3 2 0
12 2 3 2 3 0 1
13 2 1 2 0 1 3
14 1 0 2 2 2 2
15 2 3 2 0 3 2
16 0 0 2 1 1 1
17 1 3 1 2 3 0
18 2 0 1 3 1 3
19 0 1 1 1 2 2
20 1 1 1 2 1 1
21 2 0 1 0 2 0
22 2 2 1 3 3 2
23 0 3 1 1 0 3
24 2 2 1 0 0 1
25 2 3 3 3 2 3
26 1 2 3 1 1 2
27 1 0 3 1 3 3
28 0 2 3 2 2 1
29 2 1 3 0 3 1
30 2 3 3 0 1 0
31 2 1 3 3 0 2
32 0 0 3 2 0 0
Ben Beardmore
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:52 pm

Re: Strange design output for what should be straightforward...

Postby admin » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:05 am

Hi Ben,

Strange indeed. I am looking into this closely, but in the meantime you could just add another superfluous attribute. The problem does not appear in this case, and the extra column can just be ignored - all other attributes will be orthogonal. See the syntax below.

Cheers,
Andrew

Code: Select all
Design
;alts = alt1, alt2
;rows = 32
;orth = sim
;model:
U(alt1) =
b1 +
b2 * A[0,1,2,3] +
b3 * B[0,1,2,3] +
b4 * C[0,1,2,3] +
b5 * D[0,1,2,3] +
b6 * E[0,1,2,3] +
b7 * F[0,1,2,3] +
b8 * G[0,1,2,3]
$
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:00 pm

Re: Strange design output for what should be straightforward...

Postby Ben Beardmore » Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:10 am

That's the solution that I eventually used. I just thought I should bring it to your attention, as it seems like a very strange bug.
Ben Beardmore
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:52 pm

Re: Strange design output for what should be straightforward...

Postby Ben Beardmore » Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:08 pm

With the update to 1.0.2 this now seems to have been resolved. Thanks!
Ben Beardmore
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:52 pm

Re: Strange design output for what should be straightforward...

Postby Andrew Collins » Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:30 pm

Yes we addressed this problem with 1.0.2. The problem stemmed from the underlying orthogonal tables. The columns of the table can be combined to great columns with more levels - for example two columns with two levels each can be combined to create a column with four levels. With some tables this property does not hold, and the new column will introduce correlations or not have the correct number of levels. We have introduced a check to prevent these cases.

Andrew
Andrew Collins
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:48 pm


Return to Choice experiments - Ngene

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests