efficient design syntax

This forum is for posts that specifically focus on Ngene.

Moderators: Andrew Collins, Michiel Bliemer, johnr

efficient design syntax

Postby nitanan » Fri May 06, 2016 12:55 pm

Dear all THE FOLLOWING did not include the intercept (constant) therefore, is the following acceptable to run the efficient design ..tq

Design
;alts = alt1*, alt2*
;rows = 12
;eff = (mnl,d)
;block = 2
;model:
U(alt1) = b1[0.17]*A[0, 1, 2] + b2[0.18]*B[0,1,2] + b3[0.13]*C[0,1,2] + b4[0.13]*D[0,1,2] + b5[-0.2]*E[0,1,2,3] /
U(alt2) = b1*A + b2*B + b3*C + b4*D + b5*E$
nitanan
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:25 am

Re: efficient design syntax

Postby Michiel Bliemer » Fri May 06, 2016 4:46 pm

Yes this is definitely acceptable. If you have unlabelled alternatives, which you seem to have, then you typically do not include an alternative specific constant.
Michiel Bliemer
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:13 pm

Re: efficient design syntax

Postby nitanan » Sat May 07, 2016 1:58 am

Thank you for your kind reply ( Michiel Bliemer ).
nitanan
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:25 am


Return to Choice experiments - Ngene

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests