Unbalanced attribute levels in the generated experiments wit

This forum is for posts that specifically focus on Ngene.

Moderators: Andrew Collins, Michiel Bliemer, johnr

Unbalanced attribute levels in the generated experiments wit

Postby dzhang » Sun May 08, 2022 8:40 pm

Unbalanced attribute levels in the generated experiments with conditions

Hi all, I am designing an SP experiment with two unlabeled alternatives with four attributes, A, B, C, and D. A and C are continuous, while B and D are both binary. Moreover, If B=0, C would be less than 20 and D would be 1. Then I found in the generated experiments, that the frequency of B=0 would be much lesser than that of B=1, which I think is not consistent with the reality. Can anyone give a hand and some clues about what really happened and how to fix it? Thanks.
The code is attached.
Code: Select all
?SP test
Design
;alts=alt1, alt2
;rows=50
;eff=(mnl,d)
;cond:
if(alt1.B=0, alt1.C<20),
if(alt2.B=0, alt2.C<20),
if(alt1.B=0, alt1.D=1),
if(alt2.B=0, alt2.D=1)
;model:
U(alt1)=b1 * A[0:10:1] + b2 * B[0,1] + b3 * C[0:25:5] + b4 * D[0,1]/
U(alt2)=b1 * A + b2 * B + b3 * C + b4 * D
$
dzhang
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2021 1:41 am

Re: Unbalanced attribute levels in the generated experiments

Postby Michiel Bliemer » Mon May 09, 2022 12:28 am

The fact that B=0 appears much less is because of your constraints. In particular your constraint if(altx.B=0, altx.D=1). Namely, The combination B=0 and D=0 is not allowed according to this constraint, so this removes B=0 from many choice tasks.

You can consider using the modified Federov algorithm, which allows imposing constraints on the number of times each attribute level must appear within the design. This algorithm only accepts reject constraints, so I have rewritten the conditional constraints to reject constraints. Note that imposing constraints of the number of times each attribute level must appear makes it much more difficult for Ngene to find a feasible design. I was able to run the syntax below, it took several minutes before Ngene could find a feasible design. The more you relax the constraints, the more efficient your design will be.

Code: Select all
?SP test
Design
;alts=alt1, alt2
;rows=50
;eff=(mnl,d)
;alg = mfederov
;reject:
alt1.B = 0 and alt1.C = 20,
alt2.B = 0 and alt2.C = 20,
alt1.B = 0 and alt1.D = 0,
alt2.B = 0 and alt2.D = 0
;model:
U(alt1) = b1 * A[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10](3-6,3-6,3-6,3-6,3-6,3-6,3-6,3-6,3-6,3-6,3-6)
        + b2 * B[0,1](20-30,20-30)
        + b3 * C[0,5,10,15,20,25](8-12,8-12,8-12,8-12,8-12,8-12)
        + b4 * D[0,1](20-30,20-30)
        /
U(alt2) = b1 * A + b2 * B + b3 * C + b4 * D
$


Michiel
Michiel Bliemer
 
Posts: 1387
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:13 pm

Re: Unbalanced attribute levels in the generated experiments

Postby dzhang » Thu May 12, 2022 12:42 am

Thanks Michiel, it really helps!!
dzhang
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2021 1:41 am

Re: Unbalanced attribute levels in the generated experiments

Postby dzhang » Thu May 12, 2022 1:13 am

One more question, how should the required appearance times for the level be decided? Any calculation method or just a rule of thump? Thanks.
dzhang
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2021 1:41 am

Re: Unbalanced attribute levels in the generated experiments

Postby Michiel Bliemer » Thu May 12, 2022 8:49 am

You have 50 rows. If you have an attribute with 2 levels, then perfect balance will be that each level appears 25 times. So you could use (25,25) but that is too strict and Ngene will not be able to find a design. I relaxed it to (20-30,20-30). How far you need to relax depends on whether Ngene is able to find a design or not.

Michiel
Michiel Bliemer
 
Posts: 1387
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:13 pm

Re: Unbalanced attribute levels in the generated experiments

Postby dzhang » Thu May 12, 2022 10:58 am

I see. Thank you for your instruction, Michiel !!
dzhang
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2021 1:41 am


Return to Choice experiments - Ngene

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron