some detailed questions about efficient design
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 3:09 pm
Dear Ngene experts:
I am relatively new to Ngene. In the design of DCE, I encountered some detailed questions. I want to find the answers in the forum. If I can get your help, I would appreciate it very much.
1 I found a sentence in the forum. I am not sure. I try to find the answer here. It is “In an efficient design you should not use design coding or orthogonal coding but instead use the actual attribute levels” Does this mean that design coding cannot be used in all efficient design? What about efficient design? What about efficient design that includes Dummy coding or effect coding?
2 In the case that we only know the direction of the priors (We used + or - 0.0000001 to indicate the direction of priors), we use the syntax shown below to carry pilot.
Design
;alts=alt1*,alt2*,alt3*
;rows=6
;eff=(mnl,6)
;model:
U(alt1)=b1.effects[0.0000001]*A[0,1]+b2.effects[-0.0000001|-0.0000001]*B[0,1,2]+ b3.effects[0.0000001|0.0000001]*C[0,1,2]+b4.effects[0.0000001|0.0000001]*D[0,1,2]+ b5.effects[0.0000001|0.0000001]*E[0,1,2]/
U(alt2)=b1*A+b2*B+b3*C+b4*D+b5*E/
U(alt3)=b0[0]
$
3 And is there any problem with the above syntax? Is “rows=6” and “U(alt3) =b0[0]” feasible? As shown above, I use effect coding, but after collecting the data, I will calculate WTP. And my question is whether the choice of dummy coding or effect coding will have an impact on the final calculation of WTP?
4 Another option is to set the priors to 0, and my question is whether “*” can be used when the priors are zero?
I am sorry I have so many questions. Thank you very much for your help.
I am relatively new to Ngene. In the design of DCE, I encountered some detailed questions. I want to find the answers in the forum. If I can get your help, I would appreciate it very much.
1 I found a sentence in the forum. I am not sure. I try to find the answer here. It is “In an efficient design you should not use design coding or orthogonal coding but instead use the actual attribute levels” Does this mean that design coding cannot be used in all efficient design? What about efficient design? What about efficient design that includes Dummy coding or effect coding?
2 In the case that we only know the direction of the priors (We used + or - 0.0000001 to indicate the direction of priors), we use the syntax shown below to carry pilot.
Design
;alts=alt1*,alt2*,alt3*
;rows=6
;eff=(mnl,6)
;model:
U(alt1)=b1.effects[0.0000001]*A[0,1]+b2.effects[-0.0000001|-0.0000001]*B[0,1,2]+ b3.effects[0.0000001|0.0000001]*C[0,1,2]+b4.effects[0.0000001|0.0000001]*D[0,1,2]+ b5.effects[0.0000001|0.0000001]*E[0,1,2]/
U(alt2)=b1*A+b2*B+b3*C+b4*D+b5*E/
U(alt3)=b0[0]
$
3 And is there any problem with the above syntax? Is “rows=6” and “U(alt3) =b0[0]” feasible? As shown above, I use effect coding, but after collecting the data, I will calculate WTP. And my question is whether the choice of dummy coding or effect coding will have an impact on the final calculation of WTP?
4 Another option is to set the priors to 0, and my question is whether “*” can be used when the priors are zero?
I am sorry I have so many questions. Thank you very much for your help.