Page 1 of 1

All of the attribute levels were not proposed in the model

PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:06 pm
by sukunta
Dear Prof. Michiel Bliemer,
I ran the syntax
Code: Select all
design
;alts=alt1*,alt2*,alt3
;rows=12
;eff=(mnl,d)
;con
;alg=mfederov
;model:
U(alt1)=b0[0.000001]+b1.dummy[0.000002]*private[1,0]+b2.dummy[0.000002]*open[1,0]+b3[0.000002]*time[10,20,30]+b4.dummy[0.000002|0.000001]*channel[2,1,0]/
U(alt2)=b1*private+b2*open+b3*time+b4*channel/
U(alt3)=b0[0.000001]
$
D-error = 0.153416 and the 12 choices were not proposed 20 min. I do it correctly or not?

Sincerely yours,
Sukunta

Re: All of the attribute levels were not proposed in the mo

PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:14 pm
by Michiel Bliemer
Is there a reason why you are using the modified Federov algorithm? This algorithm relaxes attribute level balance and may not use all attribute levels if they are not needed (in your case, it is more efficient to use only 10 and 30 minutes). If you want all levels to appear equally in the design you should either use the default swapping algorithm (so simply remove ;alg = mfederov) or you should imposed attribute level constraints, e.g. ... + b3 *time[10,20,30](3-5,3-5,3-5) + ..., which means that each level for time should appear 3 to 5 times across the 12 choice tasks.

Michiel

Re: All of the attribute levels were not proposed in the mo

PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 1:23 am
by sukunta
Dear Prof. Michiel Bliemer,

Thank you so much for your reply. I read the topic "A way of decreasing D-error", and you suggested that

Aspects that decrease D-error:

* More choice tasks per respondent
* More alternatives
* Wider range for quantitative variables such as pr
* using the modified Federov algorithm to generate the design, which removes the attribute level balance constraint
then I tried to use the modified Federov algorithm to decrease D-error, but I do not understand the violation of level balance.
From your recommendations, I will remove ;alg = mfederov from the syntax.

Sincerely yours,
Sukunta

Re: All of the attribute levels were not proposed in the mo

PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:08 am
by Michiel Bliemer
Yes the modified Federov algorithm removes the attribute level balance constraint and therefore is able to achieve a lower D-error. If you want to have attribute level balance, as you indicate, it is best to use the default swapping algorithm.

Michiel

Re: All of the attribute levels were not proposed in the mo

PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 12:58 pm
by sukunta
Dear Prof. Michiel,
Thank your for your recommendation.

Sincerely yours,
Sukunta